Reasonable opinions
Act's law and order spokesperson on double bunking in prisons:
"Who cares if inmates don't want to be 'cooped up' together for long periods of time? These criminals have lost the right to have their comforts considered," Mr Garrett said. [...]My view - that prison should be abolished - is incomprehensible. If any MP expressed that view it would be news for weeks, but none of them would, because no one would.
The fact is: if you don't want to be assaulted - or worse - by a cellmate, avoid prison by not committing a crime,"
David Garret's view is acceptable enough that it is just quoted in a news story on double bunking, not the subject of a news story.
I keep writing things, and deleting them; they don't capture the gutteral scream of despair that I'm trying to convey. I find analysing public discourse on prisons so upsetting that I do it in very small doses.
So I will move to a slightly different angle. References, jokes, and evil press releases about prison rape, are not quarantined from the way we understand rape. They are part of that understanding, and reinforce it. I'm sure you could write a lot about that; I'm sure people have. All I want to say is that any expression that anyone, anywhere, ever, deserves to be raped reinforces the idea that some people are rapeable.
It also seems that Mr. Garrett thinks that by being imprisoned one is therefore guilty of some crime, as if a perfect justice system exists. I guess the crime would be not being able to afford legal defense. Or being a racial minority.(And therefore poor=criminal.)
ReplyDelete